Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.2.2 #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MoiMaity
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning ``` xgboost 1.6.2 requires scipy, which is not installed. tensorflow 2.11.0 requires tensorflow-io-gcs-filesystem, which is not installed. tensorboard 2.11.2 has requirement setuptools>=41.0.0, but you have setuptools 40.5.0. statsmodels 0.13.5 requires scipy, which is not installed. statsmodels 0.13.5 requires scipy, which is not installed. scikit-fuzzy 0.4.2 requires scipy, which is not installed. requests 2.31.0 requires urllib3, which is not installed. qiskit 0.44.0 requires qiskit-terra, which is not installed.
</details>





---

> [!IMPORTANT]
>
> - Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
> - Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
> - This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
> - Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

---

**Note:** _You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs._

For more information: <img src="https://api.segment.io/v1/pixel/track?data=eyJ3cml0ZUtleSI6InJyWmxZcEdHY2RyTHZsb0lYd0dUcVg4WkFRTnNCOUEwIiwiYW5vbnltb3VzSWQiOiI4ZTZjZDI2OC0zNGI4LTQxYWQtYjY2Zi03NmFlNzk5ZDZmOTYiLCJldmVudCI6IlBSIHZpZXdlZCIsInByb3BlcnRpZXMiOnsicHJJZCI6IjhlNmNkMjY4LTM0YjgtNDFhZC1iNjZmLTc2YWU3OTlkNmY5NiJ9fQ==" width="0" height="0"/>
🧐 [View latest project report](https://app.snyk.io/org/way2moitrishmaity/project/29b67d38-a8e9-44e3-a6f0-5f99d18c1eff?utm_source&#x3D;github&amp;utm_medium&#x3D;referral&amp;page&#x3D;fix-pr)
📜 [Customise PR templates](https://docs.snyk.io/scan-using-snyk/pull-requests/snyk-fix-pull-or-merge-requests/customize-pr-templates)
🛠 [Adjust project settings](https://app.snyk.io/org/way2moitrishmaity/project/29b67d38-a8e9-44e3-a6f0-5f99d18c1eff?utm_source&#x3D;github&amp;utm_medium&#x3D;referral&amp;page&#x3D;fix-pr/settings)
📚 [Read about Snyk's upgrade logic](https://support.snyk.io/hc/en-us/articles/360003891078-Snyk-patches-to-fix-vulnerabilities)

---

**Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:**

🦉 [Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.](https://learn.snyk.io/?loc&#x3D;fix-pr)

[//]: # 'snyk:metadata:{"customTemplate":{"variablesUsed":[],"fieldsUsed":[]},"dependencies":[{"name":"urllib3","from":"2.0.7","to":"2.2.2"}],"env":"prod","issuesToFix":[{"exploit_maturity":"No Known Exploit","id":"SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-7267250","priority_score":586,"priority_score_factors":[{"type":"freshness","label":true,"score":71},{"type":"fixability","label":true,"score":214},{"type":"cvssScore","label":"6","score":300},{"type":"scoreVersion","label":"v1","score":1}],"severity":"medium","title":"Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer"},{"exploit_maturity":"No Known Exploit","id":"SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-7267250","priority_score":586,"priority_score_factors":[{"type":"freshness","label":true,"score":71},{"type":"fixability","label":true,"score":214},{"type":"cvssScore","label":"6","score":300},{"type":"scoreVersion","label":"v1","score":1}],"severity":"medium","title":"Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer"},{"exploit_maturity":"No Known Exploit","id":"SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-7267250","priority_score":586,"priority_score_factors":[{"type":"freshness","label":true,"score":71},{"type":"fixability","label":true,"score":214},{"type":"cvssScore","label":"6","score":300},{"type":"scoreVersion","label":"v1","score":1}],"severity":"medium","title":"Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer"}],"prId":"8e6cd268-34b8-41ad-b66f-76ae799d6f96","prPublicId":"8e6cd268-34b8-41ad-b66f-76ae799d6f96","packageManager":"pip","priorityScoreList":[586],"projectPublicId":"29b67d38-a8e9-44e3-a6f0-5f99d18c1eff","projectUrl":"https://app.snyk.io/org/way2moitrishmaity/project/29b67d38-a8e9-44e3-a6f0-5f99d18c1eff?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=fix-pr","prType":"fix","templateFieldSources":{"branchName":"default","commitMessage":"default","description":"default","title":"default"},"templateVariants":["updated-fix-title","pr-warning-shown","priorityScore"],"type":"auto","upgrade":[],"vulns":["SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-7267250"],"patch":[],"isBreakingChange":false,"remediationStrategy":"vuln"}'

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-7267250
MoiMaity pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
…hms#8870)

* Fix insertion fail in ["*X", "*XX"] cases

Consider a word, and a copy of that word, but with the last letter repeating twice. (e.g., ["ABC", "ABCC"])
When adding the second word's last letter, it only compares the previous word's prefix—the last letter of the word already in the Radix Tree: 'C'—and the letter to be added—the last letter of the word we're currently adding: 'C'. So it wrongly passes the "Case 1" check, marks the current node as a leaf node when it already was, then returns when there's still one more letter to add.
The issue arises because `prefix` includes the letter of the node itself. (e.g., `nodes: {'C' : RadixNode()}, is_leaf: True, prefix: 'C'`) It can be easily fixed by simply adding the `is_leaf` check, asking if there are more letters to be added.

- Test Case: `"A AA AAA AAAA"`
  - Fixed correct output:
  ```
  Words: ['A', 'AA', 'AAA', 'AAAA']
  Tree:
  - A   (leaf)
  -- A   (leaf)
  --- A   (leaf)
  ---- A   (leaf)
  ```
  - Current incorrect output:
  ```
  Words: ['A', 'AA', 'AAA', 'AAAA']
  Tree:
  - A   (leaf)
  -- AA   (leaf)
  --- A   (leaf)
  ```

*N.B.* This passed test cases for [Croatian Open Competition in Informatics 2012/2013 Contest #3 Task 5 HERKABE](https://hsin.hr/coci/archive/2012_2013/)

* Add a doctest for previous fix

* improve doctest readability
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants