-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
adding osv-scanner #498
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
adding osv-scanner #498
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds OSV-Scanner documentation and references: a new tool page, sidebar entry, tools list update, and a changelog note. No code, API, or signature changes. Documentation states CodeRabbit runs OSV-Scanner only when an osv-scanner.toml file is present. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Poem
Pre-Merge Checks (1 passed, 2 warnings)❌ Failed Checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed Checks (1 passed)
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying coderabbit-docs with
|
Latest commit: |
3871850
|
Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
Preview URL: | https://0d437b78.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
Branch Preview URL: | https://feat-osv-scanner.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/changelog.md (1)
8-15
: Changelog entry reads well; consider noting plan availability if applicableThe entry clearly states the requirement for
osv-scanner.toml
and links to the docs. If OSV-Scanner is plan-gated (the tool page shows a Pro plan notice), consider adding a brief “Availability: Pro plan” note here for consistency.docs/tools/osv-scanner.md (1)
15-23
: Deduplicate the configuration requirement and strengthen the sectionLines 17 and 21 repeat the same requirement. Consolidate into the note and optionally add a quickstart to make this actionable.
Apply this diff:
## Configuration - -OSV-Scanner requires an `osv-scanner.toml` configuration file to run. - :::note - -CodeRabbit will only run OSV-Scanner if your repository contains an `osv-scanner.toml` configuration file. +OSV-Scanner runs only when your repository contains an `osv-scanner.toml` configuration file. See the official docs (linked below) for configuration options and examples. ::: +### Quickstart +1. Add an `osv-scanner.toml` file to your repository and configure it per your needs. +2. Commit and open a pull request; CodeRabbit will detect the config and run OSV-Scanner. +3. Review any reported findings directly in your PR.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs/changelog.md
(1 hunks)docs/tools/list.md
(2 hunks)docs/tools/osv-scanner.md
(1 hunks)sidebars.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.ts
⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File
**/*.ts
: - Do not allow use ofeslint-disable
,@ts-expect-error
, or@ts-ignore
unless there's a clear, inline comment explaining why it's necessary.
- Suggest early returns in place of nested
if
,else
, or loops with complex branching.- Flag function-wide scopes created by
try
/catch
or top-levelif
/else
. Recommend moving the inner logic to its own function.- Flag use of
try
/catch
for control flow. Recommend using.catch()
with appropriate error handling.- Flag
try
/catch
that introduces alet
where.catch()
withconst
could be used instead.- Flag
catch
blocks that narrow the caughterror
toError
. Suggest typing thecatch
parameter asunknown
.- Flag cases where types are narrowed manually before passing a value to the logger. Suggest passing the value directly without narrowing.
- Flag logging expressions that extract
error.message
or convert the error to a string. Suggest logging the full error value instead.- When
let
is used to accumulate a value through conditions, suggest replacing it with a function that returns the final value directly.- When encountering side effects such as mutation in
forEach
, suggest replacing withmap
,filter
, orreduce
.- Recommend introducing intermediate variables when string interpolation contains non-trivial logic.
- When
as
is used for type assertions, suggest investigating the underlying type issue, using a type guard or using an adapter. Do not flag in test files.- Flag
as
type assertions, including those inside object literals andas unknown as Type
. Recommend replacing them with type guards or adapters.- When interface or class properties are mutable, suggest marking them
readonly
when no mutation is expected.- Suggest marking all properties of DTO interfaces as
readonly
.- Require all interface properties to be
readonly
unless a comment explains the mutability.- If a class does not implement a reusable behaviour or hide private state, recomm...
Files:
sidebars.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
sidebars.ts (1)
205-205
: OSV-Scanner added to sidebar correctlyPath and ordering look consistent with existing tool entries. No issues.
docs/tools/list.md (2)
12-54
: OSV-Scanner correctly added to Tools table
- Appears in the “All” row with the right link label and category context.
- Placement aligns with alphabetical ordering near adjacent tools.
LGTM.
91-91
: Reference link for OSV-Scanner added correctlyReference target matches the new tool page path. All good.
Summary by CodeRabbit