Skip to content

unpin scipy since statsmodels was fixed #61933

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Dr-Irv
Copy link
Contributor

@Dr-Irv Dr-Irv commented Jul 24, 2025

In #61750 and #61754 @jorisvandenbossche pinned scipy due to a statsmodels issue. That has apparently been fixed, so this unpins the upper bound on scipy.

@Dr-Irv Dr-Irv requested a review from mroeschke as a code owner July 24, 2025 15:22
@mroeschke mroeschke added the Dependencies Required and optional dependencies label Jul 24, 2025
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.3.2 milestone Jul 24, 2025
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit e72c8a1 into pandas-dev:main Jul 24, 2025
47 checks passed
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @Dr-Irv

Copy link

lumberbot-app bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Owee, I'm MrMeeseeks, Look at me.

There seem to be a conflict, please backport manually. Here are approximate instructions:

  1. Checkout backport branch and update it.
git checkout 2.3.x
git pull
  1. Cherry pick the first parent branch of the this PR on top of the older branch:
git cherry-pick -x -m1 e72c8a1e0ad421c1b8a7b918d995f24bed595cc3
  1. You will likely have some merge/cherry-pick conflict here, fix them and commit:
git commit -am 'Backport PR #61933: unpin scipy since statsmodels was fixed'
  1. Push to a named branch:
git push YOURFORK 2.3.x:auto-backport-of-pr-61933-on-2.3.x
  1. Create a PR against branch 2.3.x, I would have named this PR:

"Backport PR #61933 on branch 2.3.x (unpin scipy since statsmodels was fixed)"

And apply the correct labels and milestones.

Congratulations — you did some good work! Hopefully your backport PR will be tested by the continuous integration and merged soon!

Remember to remove the Still Needs Manual Backport label once the PR gets merged.

If these instructions are inaccurate, feel free to suggest an improvement.

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

Manual backport -> #61934

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dependencies Required and optional dependencies
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants